切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 281 -285. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2025.05.005

论著

近端直肠预离断联合3D腹腔镜镜头翻转技术用于低位直肠癌ISR术
王洗, 郑伟, 李梦哲, 杨展鹏, 范青文, 梁鸿, 张超()   
  1. 450006 郑州,河南省人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-21 出版日期:2025-10-30
  • 通信作者: 张超

Application value of laparoscopic proximal rectal pre-disconnection technique (PDT) combined with 3D camera inversion technique in ISR for low rectal cancer

Xi Wang, Wei Zheng, Mengzhe Li, Zhanpeng Yang, Qingwen Fan, Hong Liang, Chao Zhang()   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Henan Provincial People′s Hospital, People′s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450006, China
  • Received:2025-09-21 Published:2025-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Chao Zhang
引用本文:

王洗, 郑伟, 李梦哲, 杨展鹏, 范青文, 梁鸿, 张超. 近端直肠预离断联合3D腹腔镜镜头翻转技术用于低位直肠癌ISR术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 281-285.

Xi Wang, Wei Zheng, Mengzhe Li, Zhanpeng Yang, Qingwen Fan, Hong Liang, Chao Zhang. Application value of laparoscopic proximal rectal pre-disconnection technique (PDT) combined with 3D camera inversion technique in ISR for low rectal cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 18(05): 281-285.

目的

探讨近端直肠预离断技术(pre-disconnection technique,PDT)联合3D腹腔镜镜头翻转技术在低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术(intersphincteric resection,ISR)中的应用可行性及安全性。

方法

回顾分析2022年3月至2025年3月收治的52例困难骨盆低位直肠癌患者的临床资料。记录并分析患者手术情况(手术时间、出血量、预防性造口率等)、术后并发症(吻合口瘘、吻合口出血等)、术后恢复情况(首次肛门排气时间、总住院时间等)及随访数据、术后病理结果(环周切缘情况、脱落细胞检查等)。

结果

所有患者均成功实施腹腔镜手术,均保留肛门,无术中死亡及中转开腹。平均手术时间为(169.0±43.5)min,平均术中出血量为(75.0±37.7)ml,两例预防性造口。术后总体并发症发生率为1.9%,包括吻合口瘘1例,行二次手术治疗。术后恢复情况,首次肛门排气时间为(2.8±0.9)d,总住院时间为(11.2±4.3)d。中位随访12个月,术后1年总体生存率为100%,无瘤生存率为100%,肛门保留率达100%。术后病理检查显示所有切缘(近端、远端及预离断切缘)均为阴性,近端切缘距离为(11.0±1.2)cm,远端切缘距离为(1.5±0.3)cm,腹腔灌洗液细胞学及细菌培养结果均为阴性。

结论

基于52例病例分析,PDT联合3D腹腔镜镜头翻转技术在低位直肠癌ISR术中的应用是一种安全、可行的技术,具有术中视野清晰、操作便利的优点,能在保证肿瘤根治性的同时实现良好的肛门保留,近期肿瘤学结局满意,是一种在ISR手术中值得推广的技术。

Objective

Feasibility and safety of proximal rectal pre-disconnection technique (PDT) combined with 3D laparoscopic camera inversion technique in intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 52 patients with low rectal cancer and a narrow pelvis treated between Mar. 2022 and Mar. 2025. Surgical outcomes (operation time, blood loss, protective stoma rate), postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding), postoperative recovery (time to first flatus, length of hospital stay), follow-up data, and pathological findings (circumferential resection margin, cytology of peritoneal lavage) were recorded and analyzed.

Results

All patients successfully underwent laparoscopic ISR with anal sphincter preservation, with no intraoperative death or conversion to open surgery. The mean operation time was 169.0 ± 43.5 minutes, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 75.0 ± 37.7 mL. Two patients required a protective stoma. The overall postoperative complication rate was 1.9%, including one case of anastomotic leakage that required reoperation. The mean time to first flatus was 2.8 ± 0.9 days, and the mean length of hospital stay was 11.2 ± 4.3 days. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the 1-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were both 100%, with a 100% sphincter preservation rate. Pathological examination confirmed negative proximal, distal, and pre-disconnection margins. The mean proximal margin was 11.0 ± 1.2 cm, and the distal margin was 1.5 ± 0.3 cm. Cytological and bacteriological examinations of peritoneal lavage fluid were negative.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis of 52 cases, the application of PDT combined with 3D laparoscopic camera inversion technique in ISR for low rectal cancer proves to be a safe and feasible approach. This technique demonstrates advantages of providing clear intraoperative visualization and facilitating surgical manipulation. While ensuring oncological radicality, it achieves satisfactory sphincter preservation with favorable short-term oncological outcomes. This technique represents a valuable and recommendable option for ISR procedures.

表1 患者基线特征
图1 助手操作注:A.助手左手钳向左侧挡住肠管;B.助手右手钳向外上牵拉肠管
图2 主刀操作注:A.主刀左手钳向头侧牵拉系膜;B.右手超声刀沿肠壁纵轴游离系膜
图3 预离断过程注:A.距离肿瘤上方5 cm处离断近端直肠;B.离断后的直肠
表2 术中相关情况
表3 术后结局
1
国家卫生健康委员会医政司,中华医学会肿瘤学分会,顾晋,等. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2023版)[J/OL]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2023, 15(3):177-206.
2
杨春康,官申. 低位直肠癌保肛手术之ISR手术策略及疗效评价[J]. 结直肠肛门外科202026(2):119-122,127.
3
Pachler J, Wille-Jørgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, 12(12):CD004323.
4
Lansom JD, Lubowski DZ. Anal sphincter preservation after rectal excision: a continuing evolution of techniques[J]. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2022, 92(3):394-400.
5
孔令琪,郑相云,朱延袤,等. 超低位直肠癌手术治疗方式的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(6):373-379.
6
中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组. 低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术中国专家共识(2023版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志2023, 26(6):536-547.
7
Piozzi GN, Kim SH. Robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technical controversies and a systematic review on the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes[J]. Annals of coloproctology, 2021, 37(6):351.
8
侯文运,肖毅. 对中低位直肠癌根治手术中"困难骨盆"的认识和思考[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志2022, 25(3):214-218.
9
Heald RJ. The 'Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery[J]. J R Soc Med, 1988, 81(9):503-508.
10
侯睿,李干斌,邱小原,等. 镜头翻转技术在腹腔镜中低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志2025, 28(6):679-683.
11
Knol J, Keller DS. Total mesorectal excision technique-past, present, and future[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2020, 33(3):134-143.
12
邱小原,林国乐,牛备战,等. TEM技术在中低位直肠癌个性化治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(4):210-217.
13
张海洪,丛亚丽. 世界医学会《赫尔辛基宣言》2024版修订述评[J]. 医学与哲学2024, 45(21):18-23.
14
梁鸿,吴凯强,范青文,等. 腹腔镜下双离断-双吻合器技术联合直肠外翻体外切除术在低位直肠癌保肛治疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志2024, 27(3):283-286.
15
王五艺,郑阳春,易波,等. 外翻拖出式经括约肌间切除在直肠恶性肿瘤超低位保肛中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(3):186-189.
16
梁鸿,姚富强,杨成城,等. 腹腔镜下免保护性造口经肛拖出式一期结肠肛管吻合术在低位直肠癌保肛术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志2025, 14(1):91-96.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3224.2025.01.010.
17
Dindo D. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications[M]. Treatment of postoperative complications after digestive surgery. London: Springer London, 2013:13-17.
18
Yang Z, Wang A, Liang H, et al. Perioperative safety evaluation of intersphincteric resection combined with rectal eversion and total extra-abdominal resection: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2025, 23(1):287.
19
Lim SW, Huh JW, Kim YJ, et al. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer[J]. World J Surg, 2011, 35(12):2811-2817.
20
Bujko K, Rutkowski A, Chang GJ, et al. Is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19(3):801-808.
21
Ishizuka M, Shibuya N, Hachiya H, et al. Influence of the no-touch isolation technique on oncologic outcomes for patients with colon cancer undergoing curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Surg Oncol, 2023, 50:101972.
22
Kimura N, Hiraki M, Furukawa S, et al. Oncological outcomes of varying resection margin lengths in colon cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis[J]. Anticancer Res, 2025, 45(9):4005-4013.
23
Shirouzu K, Murakami N, Akagi Y. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a review of the updated literature[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2017, 1(1):24-32.
[1] 徐世伟, 廖杜荣, 张镐, 叶辉, 陈志平, 雒洪志. 基于一种新炎症-营养指标构建结直肠癌术前淋巴结转移预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 383-389.
[2] 高加勒, 张忠涛. 结直肠癌外科领域最新进展与热点[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 595-599.
[3] 杜晓辉, 谢天宇, 晏阳. 我国腹腔镜结直肠癌外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 600-604.
[4] 陈朝乾, 赵宗贤, 徐顺, 姚远, 孙杰. 腹腔镜Dixon术中保留左结肠动脉对老年低位直肠癌患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 611-614.
[5] 严征远, 张恒, 曹能琦, 方兴超, 陈大敏. 单孔+1腹腔镜结直肠癌根治切除术的有效性及安全性临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 615-618.
[6] 周金哲, 王贤清, 李自强, 石启蒙, 张久强, 朱俩辰, 黄琦, 葛步军. 低位保肛新术式-结肠肛管套叠式吻合——附2例病例介绍[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 619-623.
[7] 蒲茜, 文曰, 卢春燕, 赵锐. 经肛门内镜微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 698-700.
[8] 贺雅莉, 黄丽, 杨培娟. 功能保留手术在低位直肠癌治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 701-704.
[9] 孔宪诚, 沙粒, 杜磊, 刘岗. 以卫式线引导的保留邓氏筋膜全直肠系膜切除术的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 523-526.
[10] 袁德玺, 徐海霞, 华秀丽, 申青. 适形保肛术对低位直肠癌患者术后肛门功能的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 527-530.
[11] 杨敏, 辛林璞, 杜峻峰. 三精准管理方案对直肠癌造口术后造口并发症的预防效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 531-534.
[12] 吴少锋, 王茂, 马海龙, 史英, 代引海. 新辅助治疗后肿瘤退缩分级对局部进展期直肠癌患者全直肠系膜切除术效果的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 535-538.
[13] 肖燕玲, 杜升兰, 杨春梅, 许政文, 王玫. 正中切口在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术预防性回肠造口中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 539-542.
[14] 徐其银, 韩尚志. 术前结合术后营养支持对直肠癌患者康复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 543-546.
[15] 黄英, 卢蕾, 谭倩, 罗静, 马丹, 杨莉莉, 赵海燕, 何伟. 结直肠癌并发肺部感染的临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 818-820.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?