切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 341 -346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2022.06.005

论著

免器械手工吻合技术在完全腹腔镜左半结肠切除术中的应用
王举1,(), 高小平1, 张凤联1, 姜世洲1, 王永强1, 姜洪伟1   
  1. 1. 010017 呼和浩特,内蒙古自治区人民医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-25 出版日期:2022-12-30
  • 通信作者: 王举
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2022MS08062)

The application of the staple-free hand-sewn anastomosis on the totally laparoscopic left hemicolectomy

Ju Wang1,(), Xiaoping Gao1, Fenglian Zhang1, Shizhou Jiang1, Yongqiang Wang1, Hongwei Jiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inner Mongolia Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China
  • Received:2022-10-25 Published:2022-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Ju Wang
引用本文:

王举, 高小平, 张凤联, 姜世洲, 王永强, 姜洪伟. 免器械手工吻合技术在完全腹腔镜左半结肠切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 341-346.

Ju Wang, Xiaoping Gao, Fenglian Zhang, Shizhou Jiang, Yongqiang Wang, Hongwei Jiang. The application of the staple-free hand-sewn anastomosis on the totally laparoscopic left hemicolectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 15(06): 341-346.

目的

探讨免器械手工吻合技术在完全腹腔镜左半结肠切除术(totally laparoscopic left colectomy, TLLC)中的安全性和可行性。

方法

采用回顾性队列研究方法,回顾分析内蒙古自治区人民医院胃肠外科2020年4月至2022年4月应用免器械手工吻合技术TLLC、应用吻合器完全或辅助腹腔镜左半结肠切除消化道重建的病例资料。符合入组标准的左半结肠癌患者共77例,根据消化道重建方式分为完全腹腔镜免器械手工吻合组(35例)、器械吻合组(Overlap、端对端吻合,42例)两组。统计分析腹腔镜下两种消化道重建方式患者的手术时间、吻合口并发症、腹腔感染、术后恢复情况等资料。

结果

两组性别、年龄、体质量指数、ASA分级、肿瘤部位、TNM分期、术前合并糖尿病和结肠不全梗阻等均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均行R0切除,无中转开腹手术。腹腔镜下免器械手工吻合组与器械吻合组在消化道重建时间、辅助切口方面差异有统计学意义,免器械手工吻合组重建时间长于器械吻合组[(33.7±5.0)min比(27.1±4.9)min, P<0.001],辅助切口长度短于器械吻合组[(5.6±0.84)cm比(7.7±1.11)cm, P<0.001]。两组总体并发症发生率、吻合口出血、吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄、腹腔感染并发症发生率均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后首次肛门排气时间和住院时间均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组并发症均经非手术治疗痊愈,无非计划手术和死亡病例。

结论

免器械手工吻合技术在完全腹腔镜左半结肠切除消化道重建中简便、安全、可行,可作为器械吻合的补充,但需经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医师实施。

Objective

To explore the safety and feasibly of staple-free hand-sewn laparoscopic colonic anastomosis in the totally laparoscopic left hemicolectomy.

Methods

From Apr. 2020 to Apr. 2022, in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, patients who underwent total laparoscopic left colectomy with staple-free hand-sewn and total laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted left colectomy with stapler were retrospectively analyzed. According to the method of digestive reconstruction , a total of 77 patients with left colon cancer who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: staple-free hand-sewn laparoscopic colonic anastomosis group (35 cases) and staple anastomosis (Overlap, end-to-end anastomosis) group (42 cases). The operation time, anastomotic complications, abdominal infection and postoperative recovery of the two types of digestive reconstruction were statistically analyzed.

Results

No significant differences were founded in gender, age, BMI, ASA grade, tumor location, TNM stage, preoperative diabetes mellitus and preoperative imcomplete colon obstruction between the two groups (P>0.05). R0 resection was performed in both groups, none required conversion to open surgery. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences in digestive reconstruction time and auxiliary incision between the two groups.The reconstruction time of staple-free hand-sewn group was remarkably longer than staple anastomosis group[(33.7±5.0)min vs(27.1±4.9)min, P<0.001], The length of auxiliary incision of staple-free hand-sewn group was shorter than that of staple anastomosis group[(5.6±0.84)cm vs(7.7±1.11)cm, P<0.001]. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of overall complications, anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, and abdominal infection between the two groups(P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the first flatus time and hospital stay(P>0.05). The complications of the two groups were cured by non-operative treatment. No reoperation and death cases occurred.

Conclusions

The technique of staple-free hand-sewn anastomosis is simple, safe and feasible in total laparoscopic left colectomy , it can be used as a supplement to staple anastomosis, but it needs to be performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

表1 两组左半结肠癌患者基线资料比较
图1 腹腔镜左半结肠切除术注:A.距离肿瘤远端和近端各10 cm用Echelon 60A切断横结肠和乙状结肠;B.用Covidien Vlocl 3-0倒刺线行结肠断端后壁全层连续内翻缝;C.用Covidien Vlocl 3-0倒刺线行结肠断端前壁全层连续水平褥式内翻缝合;D.用Covidien Vlocl 3-0倒刺线行结肠吻合口浆肌层连续包埋缝合加固;E.左半结肠标本;F.耻骨上横切口取标本;G.从原阑尾切口取标本
表2 两组左半结肠癌患者术后观察指标比较
1
Jacobs M, VerdejaH JC, Goldstein S. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy) [J].Surg Laparosc Endosc19911(3):144-150.
2
Scatizzi M, Kröning KC, Borrelli A, et al. Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study [J]. World J Surg, 201034:2902-2908.
3
Anania G, Santini M, Scagliarini L, et al. A totally miniinvasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery [J]. World J Gastroenterol201218:3869-3874.
4
Milone M, Elmore U, DiSalvo E, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers [J]. Surg Endosc201529:2314-2320.
5
Hiroki Hamamoto, Yusuke Suzuki, Yoshiaki Takano,et al. Medium-term oncological outcomes of totally laparoscopic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for right-sided and left-sided colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis [J].BMC Surg202222(1):345.
6
Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy-systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Surg Oncol201322:1-13.
7
Kuroyanagi H, Oya M. Factors affectingdifficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left- sided colon cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(11) :2749-2754.
8
Ricca L, Lacaine F. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a critical reading of the randomized trials of survival[J].J Chir2009146(2):136-142.
9
Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP. Intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis following laparoscopic left colon resectionJ[J]. Surg Endosc, 199711(8):800-801.
10
Darzi A, Super P, Guillou PJ, et al. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: total laparoscopic approach[J].Dis Colon Rectum199437(3):268-271.
11
Roscio F, Bertoglio C, De Luca A,et al.Totally laparoscopidresection of the splenic flexure for tumor[J]. Updates Surg, 2012, 64(3): 185-190.
12
Zhou HT, Wang P, Liang JW, et al.Short-term outcomes of overlapped delta-shaped anastomosis, an innovative intracorporeal anastomosis technique, in totally laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer[J].World J Gastroenterol, 201723(36):6726-6732.
13
Ikeda T, Kabasima A, Ueda N, et al. Totally laparoscopiccolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis achieved using a laparoscopic linear stapler: experience of a single institute [J]. Surg Today201242(1):41-45.
14
Juan Carlos Ruiz-de-Adana, Julio López-Herrero.Laparoscopic hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomoses[J].Obes Surg, 200818(9):1074-1076.
15
Lipski D, Dapri G, Himpens J. Completely staple-free handsewn laparoscopic anastomosis in colorectal surgery[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2008, 18(2): 282-285.
16
Msika S, Iannelli A, Flamant Y, et al. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with intracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis[J].Surg Endosc200014(9):866.
17
David Lipski, Giovanni Dapri, Jacques Himpens. Completely staple-free hand-sewn laparoscopic anastomosis in colorectal surgery[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 200818(2):282-285.
18
杜建军,双剑博,郑建勇,等.完全腹腔镜结肠切除术的手工缝合重建[J].中华胃肠外科杂志201114(10):772-774.
19
中国NOSES联盟,中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会NOSES专委会.结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术专家共识(2019版)[J/CD].中华结直肠疾病电子杂志20198(4):336-342.
20
Law WL, Bailey HR, Max E, et al. Single-layer continuous colon and rectal anastomosis using monofilament adsorbable suture: study of 500 cases [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 199942:736-740.
21
Phitayakorn R, Delaney CP, Reynolds HL,et al.Standardized algorithms for management of anastomotic leaks and related abdominal and pelvic abscesses after colorectal surgery [J].World J Surg200832(6):1147-1156.
22
Antonio Sciuto, Giovanni Merola, Giovanni D, et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J].World J Gastroenterol201824(21):2247-2260.
23
Benedetto Mungo, Christina M Papageorge, Miloslawa Stem,et al.The impact of operative approach on postoperative complications following colectomy for colon caner[J].World J Surg201741(8):2143-2152.
24
Tamara Braunschmid, Nikolaus Hartig, Lukas Baumann,et al.Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate [J].Surg Endosc201731(12):5318-5326.
25
Gustafsson P, Jestin P, Gunnarsson U, et al. Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study[J]. World J Surg201539(7):1834-1839.
26
Matteo Frasson, Pablo Granero-Castro, José Luis Ramos Rodríguez,et al.Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients[J].Int J Colorectal Dis201631(1):105-114.
27
Simone BD, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, et al. Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines[J]. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2020, 15(1):10.
28
Hoyuela C, Guillaumes S, Ardid J, et al. The impact of intracorporeal anastomosis in right laparoscopic colectomy in the surgical site infections and the hospital stay: a cohort study[J]. Updates Surg202173(6):2125-2135.
29
孙曦羽,邱辉忠,费凯伦,等.腹腔镜右半结肠切除腹腔内与腹腔外吻合术后腹腔感染发生情况的比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志201720(8):891-895.
30
徐徕,邱辉忠,吴斌,等.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术后并发症的Clavien-Dindo分级及预后因素分析[J].中华外科杂志201856(12):900-905.
31
Tetsuo Ishizaki, Kenji Katsumata, Masanobu Enomoto, et al. Comparison of intra-abdominal infection risk between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a single-center retrospective Study[J].Am Surg, 202187(3):341-346.
[1] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[2] 黄昌明, 郑华龙, 郑红红. 腹腔镜胃癌全胃切除术消化道重建术式选择与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 123-126.
[3] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 潘玉霞, 魏曼莉, 魏金鑫, 董云生. SPLT联合间置空肠双通道吻合在腹腔镜近端胃切除术中的近期疗效和生活质量研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 380-384.
[6] 苏向前, 宋同鲲, 徐凯. 腹腔镜远端胃切除术后消化道重建术式选择与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 368-371.
[7] 李子禹, 王胤奎. 腹腔镜全胃切除术后消化道重建术式选择与策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 364-367.
[8] 黄勇, 郑智, 张海翘, 王龙, 辛城霖, 刘小野, 尹杰, 张军. 近端胃切除术后消化道重建方式的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 456-460.
[9] 戴文鹏, 邱卫明, 王克强, 罗来斌, 徐志敏, 黄湖南, 车河龙. 食管胃结合部癌完全腹腔镜全胃切除术不同消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 300-304.
[10] 韩超, 解曙哲, 赵强, 宋应明, 连长红. 腹腔镜辅助近端胃切除双通道吻合技术治疗Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌的近期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 296-299.
[11] 赵国栋, 施喆, 孙树刚, 薛亮, 王晓辉, 杨勇. 两种消化道重建方案的腹腔镜近端胃切除术后患者胃内压变化的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 292-295.
[12] 李临川, 李戊阳, 程玉刚, 朱健康, 张光永. 近端胃切除术后消化道重建方式的现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 135-140.
[13] 范清泉, 宋晓玲, 翁明哲, 顾钧. 消化道重建术后ERCP安全性和疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 331-335.
[14] 任佳琪, 刁德昌, 何自衍, 张雪阳, 唐新, 李文娟, 李洪明, 卢新泉, 易小江. 网膜融合线导向的脾曲游离技术在左半结肠癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 362-367.
[15] 曹猛, 郭杰东, 朱灿, 许腾, 樊瑞智, 江涛, 宋军, 徐溢新. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中顺蠕动侧侧吻合的有效性及安全性评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 315-319.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?