切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06): 364 -366. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.06.013

所属专题: 文献资源库

论著 上一篇    下一篇

内镜下切除十二指肠非壶腹部病变的临床应用分析
邹家乐 1, 柴宁莉 1, 翟亚奇 1, 杜晨 1, 李隆松 1, 王向东 1, 唐平 1, 令狐恩强 1 , ( )   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-28 出版日期:2018-12-30
  • 通信作者: 令狐恩强
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1303601)

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for treating non-ampullary duodenal lesions

Jiale Zou 1, Ningli Chai 1, Yaqi Zhai 1, Chen Du 1, Longsong Li 1, Xiangdong Wang 1, Ping Tang 1, Enqiang Linghu 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2018-10-28 Published:2018-12-30
  • Corresponding author: Enqiang Linghu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Linghu Enqiang, Email:
目的

回顾性分析内镜下切除十二指肠非壶腹部病变(non-ampullary duodenal lesions, NADLs)的安全性和有效性。

方法

以在解放军总医院第一医学中心接受内镜下切除NADLs的72例患者为研究对象,对患者的基本资料、手术相关资料和术后随访资料进行回顾性分析。

结果

72例患者中,36例行内镜下黏膜切除术、22例行内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection, ESD)、14例行改良ESD术。整块切除率为83.3%,R0切除率为79.2%。其中6例(8.3%)病变发生穿孔、5例(6.9%)发生迟发出血。68例(94.4%)进行了术后随访,其中8例(11.1%)术后复查时病变局灶复发并再次接受内镜下治疗。

结论

内镜下治疗NADLs是可行的、有效的。但是由于十二指肠特殊的解剖学特点,其手术并发症发生率高,需要通过有效的预防措施来降低其发生率。

Objective

To analyze the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for the treatment of non-ampullary duodenal lesions (NADLs) retrospectively.

Methods

A total of 72 patients diagnosed with NADLs underwent endoscopic resection at the Chinese PLA General Hospital. Data on patient demographics, treatment information and follow-up results were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Among 72 patients, 36 patients underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 22 patients underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 14 patients underwent modified ESD. The rate of en bloc resection and R0 resection were 83.3% and 79.2%, respectively. Six patients (8.3%) experienced perforation and 5 patients (6.9%) experienced delayed bleeding. Follow-up endoscopy were performed for 68 cases(94.4%) and local recurrence was detected in 8 cases (11.1%), and they all underwent repeated endoscopic intervention.

Conclusions

Endoscopic resection of NADLs is feasible an effective. However, it is associated with high incidence rate of complications owing to the duodenal anatomical peculiarities. Effective methods for preventing complications are necessary.

[1]
Goda K, Kikuchi D, Yamamoto Y,et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors in japan: multicenter case series [J]. Dig Endosc,2014,26(2):23-29.
[2]
Perez A, Saltzman JR, Carr-Locke DL, et al. Benign nonampullary duodenal neoplasms [J]. J Gastrointest Surg,2003,7(4):536-541.
[3]
Mukherjee S, Kocher HM, Hutchins RR, et al. Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single UK HPB centre experience [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2008,35(7):734-738.
[4]
Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies [J]. Ann Surg,2006,244(1):10-15.
[5]
孟令威,蔡云强,李永彬,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后临床胰瘘危险因素分析[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2017,10(6):355-360.
[6]
Jepsen JM, Persson M, Jakobsen NO,et al. Prospective study of prevalence and endoscopic and histopathologic characteristics of duodenal polyps in patients submitted to upper endoscopy [J]. Scand JGastroenterol,1994,29(6):483-487.
[7]
Galandiuk S, Hermann RE, Jagelman DG,et al. Villous tumors of the duodenum [J]. Ann Surg,1988,207(3):234-239.
[8]
Perzin KH, Bridge MF. Adenomas of the small intestine: a clinicopathologic review of 51 cases and a study of their relationship to carcinoma [J]. Cancer,1981,48(3):799-819.
[9]
Delle Fave G, Kwekkeboom DJ, Van Cutsem E, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with gastroduodenal neoplasms [J]. Neuroendocrinology,2012, 95(2):74-87.
[10]
Delle Fave G, O′Toole D, Sundin A, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines up- date for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms [J]. Neuroendocrinology,2016, 103(2):119-124.
[11]
Kim DH, Kim KM, Oh SJ,et al.Early gastric cancer arising from heterotopic gastric mucosa in the gastric submucosa [J]. J Korean Surg Soc,2011,80(1):6-11.
[12]
Iitaka D, Fujiwara H, Shiozaki A,et al.Double primary cancer of the esophagus consisting of ectopic gastric mucosa-derived adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: a first case report [J]. Esophagus,2011,8(4):303-309.
[13]
Orlowska J, Jarosz D, Pachlewski J,et al. Malignant transformation of benign epithelial gastric polyps [J]. Am J Gastroenterol,1995,90(12):2152-2159.
[14]
Moss A, Bourke MJ, Tran K, et al. Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40mm colonic lesions [J]. Endoscopy, 2010,42(5):400-404.
[15]
郭花,王海红,李娜,等.胃肠道神经内分泌肿瘤的内镜下诊断与治疗[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2014,23(9):1010-1014.
[16]
Oda I, Suzuki H, Nonaka S,et al. Complications of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection [J]. Dig Endosc,2013,25(1):71-78.
[17]
Matsuda T, Matsuda T, Fujii T,et al. Complete closure of a large defect after EMR of a lateral spreading colorectal tumor when using a two-channel colonoscope [J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2004,60(5):836-838.
[18]
Hoteya S, Kaise M, Iizuka T,et al. Delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal neoplasias might be prevented by prophylactic endoscopic closure: analysis of risk factors [J]. Dig Endosc,2015,27(3):323-330.
[1] 张杰, 陈海泉, 相加庆, 张亚伟, 黄洋乐, 陈苏峰, 王胜飞, 王瑞, James Luketic. 早期食管癌内镜下手术后接受食管切除的比较分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2015, 02(01): 35-39.
阅读次数
全文


摘要