切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (05) : 286 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.05.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

单中心经自然腔道腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术临床研究
王延洲1, 徐惠成1, 李宇迪1, 陈诚1, 豆于雅1, 梁志清1,()   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,第三军医大学第一附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-08 出版日期:2018-10-30
  • 通信作者: 梁志清
  • 基金资助:
    第三军医大学第一附属医院临床新技术原始创新型重点项目(SWH2016YSCXZD-07)

Single institutional case series study in extraperitoneal sacral hysteropexy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

Yanzhou Wang1, Huicheng Xu1, Yudi Li1, Cheng Chen1, Yuya Dou1, Zhiqing Liang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2018-07-08 Published:2018-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Zhiqing Liang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liang Zhiqing, Email:
引用本文:

王延洲, 徐惠成, 李宇迪, 陈诚, 豆于雅, 梁志清. 单中心经自然腔道腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(05): 286-289.

Yanzhou Wang, Huicheng Xu, Yudi Li, Cheng Chen, Yuya Dou, Zhiqing Liang. Single institutional case series study in extraperitoneal sacral hysteropexy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 11(05): 286-289.

目的

探讨经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(natural orifice transluminalendoscopic surgery,NOTES)腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术治疗子宫脱垂的可行性、安全性和短期临床结局。

方法

2016年12月至2017年12月前瞻性纳入第三军医大学西南医院妇产科诊断为子宫脱垂的患者,行经阴道NOTES腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术。统计患者人口学特征、围手术期参数和临床疗效。

结果

14例患者尝试手术,其中13例(93%)成功完成;1例因术中腹膜破裂,无法维持腹膜外腔压力转为多孔腹腔镜手术。患者中位年龄49岁,体质量指数23.6 kg/m2,中位手术时间156 min,中位术中出血量100 ml。1例骶前出血,于术中双极电凝成功止血。术前POP-Q评分为Aa:0分;Ba:1分;C:2分;Ap:-3分;Bp:-3分。术后平均随访10个月,POP-Q评分为Aa:-2分;Ba:-2分;C:-7分;Ap:-3分;Bp:-3分。相关症状消失或明显改善,无性生活不适及性交痛,无网片侵蚀、暴露、感染等并发症。客观治愈率100%。

结论

NOTES可安全、有效地完成经阴道NOTES腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术,但需要进一步的进行临床研究,评估其完整的临床应用。

Objective

To describe the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of women with uterine prolapse treated with extraperitoneal sacral hysteropexy by natural orifice transluminalendoscopic surgery, NOTES.

Methods

Prospective descriptive study of patient with uterine prolapse that treated in Southwest Hospital from Dec.2016 to Dec.2017. NOTES as the primary therapy. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes and clinical efficacy were analyzed.

Results

14 patients were identified in whom a NOTES was attempted, 13(93%) successfully underwent the procedure and 1 had converted to 3-port laparoscopy because of the rupture of the peritoneum. The median age of the patients was 49 years, the body mass index was 23.6 kg/m2, the median operative time was 156 min, and the median operative blood loss was 100 ml. 1 cases of presacral hemorrhage were successfully treated by bipolar coagulation. Preoperative POP-Q score was Aa: 0, Ba: 1, C: 2, Ap: -3, Bp: -3. The average follow-up period of 10 months after operation, POP-Q score: Aa: -2, Ba: -2, C: -7, Ap: -3, Bp: -3.Related symptoms disappeared or obviously improved, no sexual discomfort, no erosion, exposure, infection and other complications. The rate of objective cure was 100%.

Conclusions

NOTES is feasible, safe and effective in the treatment of uterine prolapse, but further clinical studies are needed to assess its complete clinical application.

1
Maher CF, Feiner B, Decuyper EM, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 204(4):1-7.
2
Surgit O, Gumus Ⅱ. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, sacrocolpopexy and burch colposuspension performed during the same operative session via a single port[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011, 283(1): 127-131.
3
Ingber MS, Colton MD, Zimmerman GE. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) hysteropexy[J]. Updates in Surgery, 2012, 64(1):53-57.
4
Marcus-Braun N, Theobald PV. Single port laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in a young patient presenting with grade III uterine prolapse and rectocele[J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2013, 24(9):1445-1446.
5
Tobiasmachado M, Chicoli FA, Jr CR, et al. LESS sacrocolpopexy: step by step of a simplified knotless technique[J]. International Braz J Urol Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, 2012, 38(38):859-860.
6
Behniawillison F, Garg A, Keirse MJNC. A laparoendoscopic single-site surgery approach to mesh sacrohysteropexy[J]. Case Rep Med,2013, 2013(5):641675-641675.
7
Ahmed GM. Single port laparoscopic mesh rectopexy[J]. Prz Gastroenterol, 2016, 11(2): 123-126.
8
Guan X, Ma Y, Gisseman J, et al. Robotic single-site sacrocolpopexy using barbed suture anchoring and peritoneal tunneling technique: tips and tricks[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2017, 24(1):12-13.
9
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(5): 818-824.
10
刘海元,陈欣,孙大为,等.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在异位妊娠中的应用八例分析[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(1):20-23.
11
Chen X, Liu H, Sun D, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for tubal pregnancy and a device innovation from our institution[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2018.[Epub ahead of print]
12
Noblett KL, Murphy M, Guerette N. Natural orifice vaginal sacrocolpopexy (NOVaS): a cadaver feasibility study[J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23(4):447-452.
13
Chen Y, Li J, Hua K. Transvaginal single-port laparoscopy pelvic reconstruction with y-shaped mesh[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018.[Epub ahead of print]
14
Chen Y, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Transvaginal single-port laparoscopy sacrocolpopexy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(4): 585-588.
15
Liu J, Kohn J, Sun B, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018.[Epub ahead of print]
16
中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组. 盆腔器官脱垂的中国诊治指南(草案)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(9):647-651.
17
Zucchi A, Lazzeri M, Porena M, et al. Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery[J]. Nature Reviews Urology, 2010, 7(11):626-626.
18
Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, et al. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse[J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2016, 27(1):93-101.
[1] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[2] 庄宝雄, 邓海军. 单孔+1腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-601.
[3] 宋连奎, 王建成, 王竹林, 王春生, 木洪伟, 季洪阁. TAPP和TEP治疗腹股沟疝临床效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-447.
[4] 李凯, 张志远, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 一种可拆卸组装的腹腔镜手术器械在单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 250-250.
[5] 夏慧, 廖慧, 戴艳萍, 吴俊萍, 杨诚, 李建雄, 刘存东. 医护合作——快速康复模式在单孔腹腔镜上尿路重建围手术期的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 266-270.
[6] 陈金水, 陈金福, 郑开福, 祝晓路, 王铁虎, 谭俊, 李正平. 腹腔镜疝修补术治疗原发性耻骨上疝七例的临床体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 548-551.
[7] 蒋会勇, 杨柳, 郭吉祥, 王春帅, 马春, 李琦, 蔡相军. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外患侧外侧间隙入路腹股沟疝修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 414-417.
[8] 张庆峰, 邓旭明, 段巧斌, 姚干, 张策. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外斜疝修补手术关闭内环口对血清肿发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 282-290.
[9] 肖家全, 张勇, 严伟. 经腹腹膜前与完全腹膜外疝修补术对腹股沟斜疝的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 302-306.
[10] 唐虹, 周奇, 欧阳晓玲, 王永峰, 华宇, 郝小白, 李林霞. 腹膜外无张力吊带子宫悬吊术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-319.
[11] 胡启明, 鄢潇, 尤志学, 黄骁昊. 经瘢痕处单孔腹腔镜下切除多病灶腹壁子宫内膜异位症[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 314-317.
[12] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[13] 蒋露, 郑莹, 杨帆, 王乔, 王娜, 阳川华, 陈宇, 苟嘉妮, 邓露丝, 杨旭. 经脐单孔腹腔镜联合上腹部开腹行晚期卵巢癌肿瘤细胞减灭术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 177-181.
[14] 王酉, 严斌, 狄文, 楼微华. 经脐单孔腹腔镜前哨淋巴结活检术在早期子宫内膜癌手术中的探讨[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 173-176.
[15] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?