切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (05): 286 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.05.007

所属专题: 文献资源库

论著 上一篇    下一篇

单中心经自然腔道腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术临床研究
王延洲 1, 徐惠成 1, 李宇迪 1, 陈诚 1, 豆于雅 1, 梁志清 1 , ( )   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,第三军医大学第一附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-08 出版日期:2018-10-30
  • 通信作者: 梁志清
  • 基金资助:
    第三军医大学第一附属医院临床新技术原始创新型重点项目(SWH2016YSCXZD-07)

Single institutional case series study in extraperitoneal sacral hysteropexy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

Yanzhou Wang 1, Huicheng Xu 1, Yudi Li 1, Cheng Chen 1, Yuya Dou 1, Zhiqing Liang 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2018-07-08 Published:2018-10-30
  • Corresponding author: Zhiqing Liang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liang Zhiqing, Email:
目的

探讨经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(natural orifice transluminalendoscopic surgery,NOTES)腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术治疗子宫脱垂的可行性、安全性和短期临床结局。

方法

2016年12月至2017年12月前瞻性纳入第三军医大学西南医院妇产科诊断为子宫脱垂的患者,行经阴道NOTES腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术。统计患者人口学特征、围手术期参数和临床疗效。

结果

14例患者尝试手术,其中13例(93%)成功完成;1例因术中腹膜破裂,无法维持腹膜外腔压力转为多孔腹腔镜手术。患者中位年龄49岁,体质量指数23.6 kg/m2,中位手术时间156 min,中位术中出血量100 ml。1例骶前出血,于术中双极电凝成功止血。术前POP-Q评分为Aa:0分;Ba:1分;C:2分;Ap:-3分;Bp:-3分。术后平均随访10个月,POP-Q评分为Aa:-2分;Ba:-2分;C:-7分;Ap:-3分;Bp:-3分。相关症状消失或明显改善,无性生活不适及性交痛,无网片侵蚀、暴露、感染等并发症。客观治愈率100%。

结论

NOTES可安全、有效地完成经阴道NOTES腹膜外骶骨子宫固定术,但需要进一步的进行临床研究,评估其完整的临床应用。

Objective

To describe the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of women with uterine prolapse treated with extraperitoneal sacral hysteropexy by natural orifice transluminalendoscopic surgery, NOTES.

Methods

Prospective descriptive study of patient with uterine prolapse that treated in Southwest Hospital from Dec.2016 to Dec.2017. NOTES as the primary therapy. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes and clinical efficacy were analyzed.

Results

14 patients were identified in whom a NOTES was attempted, 13(93%) successfully underwent the procedure and 1 had converted to 3-port laparoscopy because of the rupture of the peritoneum. The median age of the patients was 49 years, the body mass index was 23.6 kg/m2, the median operative time was 156 min, and the median operative blood loss was 100 ml. 1 cases of presacral hemorrhage were successfully treated by bipolar coagulation. Preoperative POP-Q score was Aa: 0, Ba: 1, C: 2, Ap: -3, Bp: -3. The average follow-up period of 10 months after operation, POP-Q score: Aa: -2, Ba: -2, C: -7, Ap: -3, Bp: -3.Related symptoms disappeared or obviously improved, no sexual discomfort, no erosion, exposure, infection and other complications. The rate of objective cure was 100%.

Conclusions

NOTES is feasible, safe and effective in the treatment of uterine prolapse, but further clinical studies are needed to assess its complete clinical application.

1
Maher CF, Feiner B, Decuyper EM, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 204(4):1-7.
2
Surgit O, Gumus Ⅱ. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, sacrocolpopexy and burch colposuspension performed during the same operative session via a single port[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011, 283(1): 127-131.
3
Ingber MS, Colton MD, Zimmerman GE. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) hysteropexy[J]. Updates in Surgery, 2012, 64(1):53-57.
4
Marcus-Braun N, Theobald PV. Single port laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in a young patient presenting with grade III uterine prolapse and rectocele[J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2013, 24(9):1445-1446.
5
Tobiasmachado M, Chicoli FA, Jr CR, et al. LESS sacrocolpopexy: step by step of a simplified knotless technique[J]. International Braz J Urol Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, 2012, 38(38):859-860.
6
Behniawillison F, Garg A, Keirse MJNC. A laparoendoscopic single-site surgery approach to mesh sacrohysteropexy[J]. Case Rep Med,2013, 2013(5):641675-641675.
7
Ahmed GM. Single port laparoscopic mesh rectopexy[J]. Prz Gastroenterol, 2016, 11(2): 123-126.
8
Guan X, Ma Y, Gisseman J, et al. Robotic single-site sacrocolpopexy using barbed suture anchoring and peritoneal tunneling technique: tips and tricks[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2017, 24(1):12-13.
9
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(5): 818-824.
10
刘海元,陈欣,孙大为,等.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在异位妊娠中的应用八例分析[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2018,11(1):20-23.
11
Chen X, Liu H, Sun D, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for tubal pregnancy and a device innovation from our institution[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2018.[Epub ahead of print]
12
Noblett KL, Murphy M, Guerette N. Natural orifice vaginal sacrocolpopexy (NOVaS): a cadaver feasibility study[J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23(4):447-452.
13
Chen Y, Li J, Hua K. Transvaginal single-port laparoscopy pelvic reconstruction with y-shaped mesh[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018.[Epub ahead of print]
14
Chen Y, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Transvaginal single-port laparoscopy sacrocolpopexy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(4): 585-588.
15
Liu J, Kohn J, Sun B, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery sacrocolpopexy: tips and tricks[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018.[Epub ahead of print]
16
中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组. 盆腔器官脱垂的中国诊治指南(草案)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(9):647-651.
17
Zucchi A, Lazzeri M, Porena M, et al. Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery[J]. Nature Reviews Urology, 2010, 7(11):626-626.
18
Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, et al. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse[J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2016, 27(1):93-101.
[1] 曾锐, 董焱鑫, 高晓康, 朱明德, 霍双进, 李东, 尼加提, 房卉. 腹膜外入路腹腔镜下膀胱颈悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁TVT-O术后失败或复发患者的初步经验[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 51-54.
[2] 罗宏宇, 刘小飞, 李国权, 徐元庆, 胡雄威. 增强视野完全腹膜外疝修补术在中线腹壁疝的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 357-360.
[3] 余磊, 魏寇准, 刘志刚, 陈光彬, 王志. 不同手术入路对腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术临床疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 361-365.
[4] 赵薇, 岳小雯. 腹腔镜下子宫悬吊术结合阴道前后壁修补术治疗重度子宫脱垂合并阴道后壁肠疝围手术期管理对策[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 267-271.
[5] 金磊, 刘文生. 腹腔镜下单通道腹膜外高位结扎术在儿童腹股沟疝治疗中的研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 138-141.
[6] 吴卫东, 蒋会勇, 孟相真, 刘国忠, 蔡小燕, 王涛, 刘剑文, 崔夕军, 司仙科, 魏云, 汤睿. 内镜下全腹膜外Sublay修补在腹壁疝中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 12-18.
[7] 戴文娟, 陆建红, 李加芬. 人文医疗在阴式全子宫切除术联合阴道后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂合并肠疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 71-75.
[8] 刘星, 李炳根, 秦昌富. 巨大腰疝经后腹腔镜全腹膜外补片修补术一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 177-180.
[9] 朱可安, 陈灵, 李昭, 黄薇. 应用单孔腹腔镜开展常见妇科手术的可行性探讨[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 158-162.
[10] 金贝贝, 张玉泉, 李季, 高赛楠, 朱春玉, 丁晓颖, 杨晓清. 普通及机器人辅助经脐单孔腹腔镜在子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 163-167.
[11] 徐晓钢, 曾纪晓, 刘斐, 兰梦龙, 陶波圆, 林玉珍. 经脐单孔3D腹腔镜手术治疗小儿先天性胆总管囊肿[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 172-176.
[12] 曹言言, 彭仁国, 文芳, 訾聃. 单孔腹腔镜对Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌手术患者疼痛及负性情绪的影响分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 90-96.
[13] 秦真岳, 王慧慧, 陈继明, 鲍明月, 郑亚峰, 肖惠超, 马洋, 蒋云芬, 施如霞. 单孔腹腔镜手术治疗Ⅲ型(包块型)子宫瘢痕妊娠[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 122-126.
[14] 王永鹏, 孙大为. 单孔腹腔镜手术治疗妊娠早期子宫圆韧带肌瘤一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 116-118.
[15] 周容, 令狐华, 代雪林, 代凤琴, 龚瑶. 经脐单孔腹腔镜在晚期卵巢恶性肿瘤初始评估及活检中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(01): 33-36.
阅读次数
全文


摘要