切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04): 253 -256. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.04.017

所属专题: 文献资源库

综述 上一篇    

浅谈微创手术在妇科恶性肿瘤领域的现状
高原 1, 孟元光 1 , ( )   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,解放军总医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-07 出版日期:2018-08-30
  • 通信作者: 孟元光

A brief discussion on the status of minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic malignant tumor

Yuan Gao 1, Yuanguang Meng 1 , ( )   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2018-06-07 Published:2018-08-30
  • Corresponding author: Yuanguang Meng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Meng Yuanguang, Email:

微创手术是外科领域近30年来最伟大的技术革新。与传统开放手术相比,它大大减少了手术创伤和切口相关并发症,如手术部位感染、术后疼痛、疝等,微创手术也缩短了在院时间,保持了腹壁皮肤的完整性。尽管如此,微创手术技术仍在进一步更新,因为传统腹腔镜手术存在深度感知受限、摄像机稳定性欠缺、运动范围有限、学习曲线陡峭等局限性。因此,20世纪80年代以来,为克服传统腹腔镜技术所遇到的瓶颈,在复杂手术中提高手术的准度和精度,促进微创手术的革新和广泛应用,机器人手术系统应运而生,它改进了三维立体视觉、扩大了术者视野、提高了操作设备的灵巧性、降低了可能影响手术精度的震颤。目前,机器人手术系统作为一个前沿的微创手术方法已广泛应用于妇科领域,尤其是妇科恶性肿瘤领域。笔者通过回顾文献,并结合自己的经验,总结达芬奇机器人系统在妇科恶性肿瘤领域的应用效果。

Minimally invasive surgery can be considered as the greatest innovation over the past 30 years in surgical field. It revolutionized surgical practice with well-proven advantages over traditional open surgery: reduced surgical trauma and incision-related complications, such as surgical-site infections, postoperative pain and hernia, reduced hospital stay, and improved cosmetic outcome. Nonetheless, proficiency in MIS can be technically challenging as conventional laparoscopy is associated with several limitations as the reduction in-depth perception, camera instability, limited range of motion, and steep learning curves. Since the 1980s, The robotic surgical system has sprung up to over come the difficulties encountered with conventional laparoscopy, to augment the surgeon′s skills, achieve accuracy and high precision during complex surgery, and facilitate wide spread of MIS. Robotically assisted technology offers advantages that include improved three-dimensional stereoscopic vision, wristed instruments that improve dexterity, and tremor canceling software that improves surgical precision. Robotic surgery has emerged as an innovative minimally invasive approach in the field of gynecology with increasing frequency, especially in the field of gynecologic malignant tumor. We viewed the literature with the aim to assess and describe the applications of robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology in terms as of its utility and outcome.

1
Diana M, Marescaux J. Robotic surgery[J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2015, 102(2):15-28.
2
Sfakianos GP, Frederick PJ, Kendrick JE, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors[J]. International Journal of Medical Robotics & Computer Assisted Surgery, 2010, 6(4):405-412.
3
Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a society of gynecologic oncology consensus statement. developed by the society of gynecologic oncology's clinical practice robotics task force[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2012, 124(2):180-184.
4
Worldwide A. Aagl position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2013, 20(1):2-9.
5
Sert MB, Abeler V. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the norwegian radium hospital[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2011, 121(3):600-604.
6
Soliman PT, Langley G, Munsell MF, et al. Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2013, 20(4):1355-1359.
7
Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, et al. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type Ⅲ robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2010, 117(2):260-265.
8
Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type Ⅲ radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2008, 199(4):357-357.
9
Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, et al. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18(9):2622-2628.
10
Sinno AK, Fader AN. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology[J]. Fertility & Sterility, 2014, 102(4):922-932.
11
Paley PJ, Dan SV, Shah CA, et al. Surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology in the era of robotics: analysis of first 1000 cases[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 204(6):551-559.
12
Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, et al. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review[J]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010, 116(6):1422-1431.
13
Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS, et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy[J]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009, 114(1):16-21.
14
Vaknin Z, Perri T, Lau S, et al. Outcome and quality of life in a prospective cohort of the first 100 robotic surgeries for endometrial cancer, with focus on elderly patients[J]. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2010, 20(8):1367-1373.
15
Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A, et al. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2008, 111(1):41-45.
16
Feuer GA, Lakhi N, Barker J, et al. Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2013, 131(3):520-524.
17
Listed N. Committee opinion no. 628: robotic surgery in gynecology[J]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015, 125(3):760-767.
18
Jr JPL, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2008, 15(5):589-594.
19
Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first on[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2011, 120(3):413-418.
20
Sandadi S, Gadzinski JA, Lee S, et al. Fellowship learning curve associated with completing a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2014, 132(1):102-106.
21
Sgarbura O, Vasilescu C. The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24(12):3149-3155.
[1] 吴丰信, 吴英光, 俞建雄, 王胜. 腹腔镜辅助保留幽门胃部分切除术治疗早期胃中部癌近期疗效分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 326-330.
[2] 周仕海, 陈宏, 张静, 雒洪志, 冯春在, 孙浩, 钟思全. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取出标本手术67例分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 340-343.
[3] 陈松, 唐宇哲, 付猛, 苏博兴, 刘宇保, 肖博, 胡卫国, 李建兴. 良性输尿管狭窄的治疗:90例单中心回顾分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 313-316.
[4] 张昊, 姜元军, 刘涛. 顺行性腹腔镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术14例经验总结[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 317-320.
[5] 刘广旭, 刘涛. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜在肾部分切除术中的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 330-333.
[6] 术者:张树彬 助手:邢中强 段佳悦 李昂 指导老师:刘建华 剪辑:徐晨. 健侧先行原位右半肝+全尾状叶切除的腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌根治术[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 0-.
[7] 褚薛慧. 腹腔镜肝右后叶切除术[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 0-.
[8] 卢攀 刘心怡 李坚 陈龙 张伟. 经脐单孔腹腔镜左半肝切除术[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 0-.
[9] 张硕, 杨军, 顾元龙. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术致胆道损伤的危险因素及处理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 470-473.
[10] 吴志明, 黄洪军, 孟兴成, 葛佳皓, 沈丽青, 胡常恩, 虞洪. ERAS理念在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 474-478.
[11] 丁天龙, 谷保红, 李雪梅, 胡继科, 张凡, 冯泽东, 马斌, 王琛, 陈昊. "脱衣法"腹腔镜胆囊切除术的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 498-501.
[12] 王峰杰, 陈焕伟, 刘颖, 雷秋成, 宁燕文. 腹腔镜胰体尾切除手术入路及安全性[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 506-509.
[13] 李国林, 王秀, 陈桂婵, 邱逸红. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术围手术期标准化管理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 510-513.
[14] 李涛, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 沙地克·阿帕尔, 白磊, 曹峻, 何翼彪, 王智鹏, 赵晋明. 全腹腔镜活体供肝右半肝切取术一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 514-518.
[15] 蓝炘, 朴成林, 安峰铎, 谈明坤, 司振铎, 吴蔚, 赵娜, 冷建军. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜下肝癌切除术的短期疗效比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 327-330.
阅读次数
全文


摘要