切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 144 -146. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2017.03.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的临床研究
李鑫1, 骆成玉1,(), 李海连2, 崔智淼1   
  1. 1. 100038 北京,首都医科大学附属复兴医院普外科
    2. 100038 北京,首都医科大学附属复兴医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-30 出版日期:2017-06-30
  • 通信作者: 骆成玉

Clinical investigation of laparoscopic gastrectomy to patients with gastric cancer

Xin Li1, Chengyu Luo1,(), Hailian Li2, Zhimiao Cui1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Fuxing Hosptial, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
    2. Department of Oncology, Fuxing Hosptial, CapitalMedical University, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2017-04-30 Published:2017-06-30
  • Corresponding author: Chengyu Luo
  • About author:
    Correspondence author: Luo Chengyu, Email:
引用本文:

李鑫, 骆成玉, 李海连, 崔智淼. 腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(03): 144-146.

Xin Li, Chengyu Luo, Hailian Li, Zhimiao Cui. Clinical investigation of laparoscopic gastrectomy to patients with gastric cancer[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 10(03): 144-146.

目的

探讨腹腔镜胃癌根治术(laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy,LDG)的安全性及根治效果。

方法

选取首都医科大学附属复兴医院普外科同一手术团队2012年1月至2014年1月收治的胃癌患者106例,采取非随机(患者自愿)的方式分为LDG(观察组)54例及胃癌开腹根治术(open distal gastrectomy,ODG)(对照组)52例,对比两组患者术中情况及术后恢复情况的数项指标。

结果

两组患者的年龄、性别、病理分期等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。两组患者的术中出血量[(85.0 ± 10.9)ml vs (145.4 ± 27.0)ml]、术后下床时间[(1.3 ± 0.5)d vs (4.8 ± 0.7)d]、术后住院时间[(5.9 ± 1.2)d vs(11.6±0.8)d]比较,差异均有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。两组患者的手术时间[(182.0 ± 8.4)min vs (183.3 ± 8.5) min]、淋巴结清扫数[(15.9 ± 2.4)枚vs (15.8 ± 2.4)枚]、术后局部复发、术后远处转移及术后3年生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。

结论

LDG具有手术损伤小、术后恢复时间短的优点,与ODG相比具有同样的安全性及肿瘤根治效果,在临床治疗上值得进一步推广。

Objective

To analyze the short-term and long-term outcomes of the laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Methods

A total of 106 patients from Jan.2012 to Jan.2014 in our department by same group with non-metastatic gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. The patients underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy (n=54) or open surgery (n=52), the indexes of intraoperative and postoperative recovery were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in age, sex, pathological staging and other general information of two groups of patients (P>0.05). There were significant differences in intraoperative blood loss[(85.0±10.9) ml, (145.4±27.0) ml], leaving bed time[(1.3±0.5) day, ( 4.8±0.7) day] and hospital stay[(5.9±1.2)day, (11.6±0.8)day, P<0.05]. No significant differences were found in operation time [(182.0±8.4) min, ( 183.3±8.5) min], the number of lymph node dissection[(15.9±2.4), ( 15.8±2.4)] and the overall survival rate three years after operation (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic gastrectomy has the advantages of less trauma, shorter hospitalization time and has better short-term outcomes including postoperative recovery than open surgery.It is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 胃癌患者的两组一般资料比较
表2 胃癌患者的两组手术相关资料的比较(±s)
表3 胃癌患者的两组术后相关资料的比较(±s)
表4 胃癌患者的两组术后随访情况的比较[例(%)]
1
Slim R, Smayra T, Chakhtoura G, et al. Endoscopic stenting of gastric staple line leak following sleeve gastrectomy[J]. Obesity Surgery, 2013, 23(11): 1942-1945.
2
李国新,陈韬. 全腹腔镜胃癌根治术及消化道重建发展现状与前景[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2016, 36(9): 929-934.
3
Son SY, Kim HH. Minimally invasive surgery in gastric cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol,2014,20(39): 14132-14141.
4
周辉年,郭凌云,展昊,等. 开腹和腹腔镜胃癌根治对比[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(4): 217-220.
5
周轩,张建文,谭观桥,等. 早期胃癌腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗的对比研究[J]. 中国肿瘤外科杂志,2016, 8(5): 327-329.
6
Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted billroth i gastrectomy[J]. surg laparosc endosc,1994, 4(2): 146-148.
7
Tsunoda S, Okabe H, Obama K, et al. Short-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy: experience with the first consecutive 112 cases[J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38(10): 2662-2667.
8
Song K, Park CH, Kim J, et al. Is totally laparoscopic gastrectomy less invasive than laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy: prospective, multicenter study[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008, 12(6): 1015-1021.
9
姚宏伟,陈宁,连玉贵. 3D完全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术消化道重建方式的选择[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2016,10(1): 10-13.
10
Hu Y, Ying M, Huang C, et al. Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort study from China[J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28(7): 2048-2056.
11
Shuang J, Qi S, Zheng J, et al. A case-control study of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2011, 15(1): 57-62.
12
王杰,吴东. 腹腔镜与开腹行胃癌根治术比较的Meta分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2016, 44(9): 64-69.
13
王玲的,胡时栋,马跃,等. 腹腔镜辅助与开腹胃癌根治术的短期临床效果比较[J]. 解放军医学院学报,2016, 37(6): 541-543.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?